Sukhlal Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40210 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2015 Thana -MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Sukhlal Manjhi Son of Late Soharai Manjhi, resident of VillageMobarakpur, Tola- Punadih, P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Magadh University P.S.Case NO.34 of 2015 dated 31.5.2015 Tr. No.982 of 2016 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of assault to the deceased causing his death. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is general and omnibus allegation and the persons having similar allegation has already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 9.2.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.50070 of 2015 and order dated 11.3.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.950 of 2016. The petitioner is in custody for more than three months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40210 of 2017 (2) dt.25-08-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Magadh University P.S.Case NO.34 of 2015 dated 31.5.2015 Tr. No.982 of 2016 arising out of G.R.No.2555 of 2015. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T