← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/848/2019disposed

Keshri Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-03-13Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.848 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15739 of 2014 ====================================================== Keshri Kumar Sinha Son of Late Guru Prasad Resident of Mohalla - Baratpur, P.O. - Aurangabad, P.S. - Aurangabad Town, District - Aurangabad, Bihar, PIN- 824101 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar and Ors through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna (Earstwhile Rural Engineering Organization, Govrnment of Bihar, Patna through its Secretary. 2.

Mr. Vinay Kumar, The Principal Secretary Rural Works Departent, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Vinay Kumar, The Secretary Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Udaykant Chaudhary, The Deputy Secretary Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, The Chief Engineer- 1 Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, The Superintending Engineer Rural Works Department, Gaya Work Circle, Gaya.

7.

Mr. Umesh Kumar, The Executive Engineer Rural Works Department, Aurangabad Works Division, Aurangabad.

8.

Mr. Surendra Pratap Singh, The Correspondence Clerk Rural Works Department, Aurangabad Works Division, Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay (GA-5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-03-2024 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner although the State is present.

2. On 06.10.2018 in CWJC No. 15739 of 2014, the Writ Court had directed the opposite party no. 6 to consider the claim of the petitioner within a period of six weeks.

Patna High Court MJC No.848 of 2019(4) dt.13-03-2024 2/2

3. A show cause on behalf of the opposite party nos. 1 to 8 annexing memo no. 2190 dated 21.10.2019 issued by the Superintending Engineer is on record by which his claim has been negated.

4. In that view of the matter, the order stands complied. The petitioner has a liberty to challenge the order, if he so wants.

5. The MJC No. 848 of 2019 stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) kiran/- U