Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18064 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2019 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

SUNITA DEVI Wife of Papu Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur.

2.

Pappu Musahar Son of Sheo Kumar Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur. 3.

Shikesh Musahar Son of Sheo Kumar Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur. 4.

Viki Musahar Son of Ram Chandra Musahar @ Birendra Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur. 5.

Satendra Musahar Son of Late Ram Chandra Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur. 6.

Pinki Devi Wife of Satendra Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur.

7.

Akami Devi Wife of Kamlesh Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur.

8.

Bahadur Musahar Son of Desai Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur.

9.

Ranjan Musahar Son of Ram Chandra Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur. 10.

Sarita Devi Wife of Kanchan Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur.

11.

Tiwari Musahar Son of Fagu Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur.

12.

Bhola Musahar Son of Tiwari Musahar Resident of village - Bhadeyan, P.S. - Ara Mufasil, District - Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18064 of 2022(2) dt.29-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application. Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T