Umesh Yadav @ Umesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15653 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2019 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== UMESH YADAV @ UMESH KUMAR, Son of Lato Yadav, R/o villageSahpur, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Syed Asgher Najmi For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 5 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act..

Allegation as per FIR is that police on information of preparation of dacoity raided the place of occurrence and found stolen property in possession of the accused persons and one accused Sonu Kumar was arrested and from whose possession one rifle was recovered and he disclosed that the rifle was of the petitioner.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that except the aforesaid statement there is nothing against the petitioner and there is no recovery from his possession and he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15653 of 2019(2) dt.29-03-2019 2/2 has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 5 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T