← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15963/2025bail granted

Sarfaraz v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-21Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15963 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2024 Thana- Madanpur District- Araria ====================================================== Sarfaraz S/o Tabrej Alam, R/o Village- Bochi, Ward No. 03, P.S- Bairgachhi, Dist.- Araria.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2024, dated 08.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2) and 109 of the B.N.S., 2023 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant was on the way to Madanpur market for purchasing garage goods, meanwhile the co-accused persons including the petitioner stopped informant's bike and badly assaulted him and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that although informant has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15963 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 received three injuries out of which two injures are simple in nature and one injury is grievous in nature that is found on his right wrist, but a compromise has taken place between the parties. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner's period of custody as well as the fact that a compromise has taken place between the parties, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T