Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38973/2018bail granted

Sikandar Tanti @ Sakindra Tanti v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-07-06Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38973 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1736 Year- 2012 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- JAMUI ====================================================== Sikandar Tanti @ Sakindra Tanti, S/o Yaddu Tanti @ Jadu Tanti, R/o Vill.- Bajatpur, P.S.- Halsi, District- Lakhisarai.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Parwati Devi W/o Sri Sikandar Tanti @ Sakindra Tanti, R/o Vill.- Halsi, P.S.- Halsi, District- Lakhisarai, at present Address- D/o Sri Chando Tanti, R/o Vill.- Garsanda, P.S. + District- Jamui. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 04.04.2018, in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 323 of the IPC and Section 3/4 of the D. P. Act. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38973 of 2018 (2) dt.06-07-2018 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. 3rd, Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No. 1736C of 2012. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T