Bharat Kumar @ Golu @ Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24996 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-564 Year-2018 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

BHARAT KUMAR @ GOLU @ GOLU KUMAR Son of Munna Singh @ Rajiv Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Khamhar, P.S.- Mufassil, DistrictBegusarai. 2.

Lakhan Kumar @ Lalu @ Lalu Kumar @ Lakhan Kumar Lalu Son of Munna Singh @ Rajiv Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Khamhar, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Begusari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2019 At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No.1 has been taken into custody, therefore, he does not press this application with respect to petitioner No.1 only.

Accordingly, this application as with regard to petitioner No. 1 has become infructuous.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 564 of 2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 385 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24996 of 2019(2) dt.18-04-2019 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner and the informant are co-villagers and due to land dispute, this false case has been lodged against the petitioner. Moreover, no one has sustained injuries in this case. Hence, the petitioner may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner in the event of surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 564 of 2018 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T