← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12254/2014dismissed

Rajendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-22Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12254 of 2014 ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad S/o Late Shyam Lal Yadav Resident of Village Rasalpur, P.S. Navgachia, District Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Bihar Public Service Commission through its Secretary, 15th Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg Bailey Road Pat 3.

The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission through its Secretay, 15th Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg Bai 4.

The Special Work Officer, Bihar Public Service Commission through its Secretary, 15th Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna 5.

The Examination Controller-cum-Additional Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission through its Secretary ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinu Kumar For the State :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Roy, AC to GP11 For BPSC Mr. Stayabir Bharti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-04-2019 Petitioner has filed writ petition claiming that he ought to have been awarded higher marks than what was awarded to him in Combined Competitive Examination conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission.

Respondents have filed counter affidavit whereby specific stand is that the petitioner had secured 793 marks whereas cut off mark was 820 in his reserved category of backward class. Claim of the petitioner for revaluation and reassessment of his mark based on the basis of self serving assessment can not be allowed by this court. More so, in absence of any attribution of

Patna High Court CWJC No.12254 of 2014 dt.22-04-2019 2/2 specific malafide, writ petition does not disclose any issue worth consideration.

Apart from that this court also takes note of the fact that the petitioner had appeared in 53rd to 55th combined joint competitive examination in the year 2011. In the meantime, many competitive examinations have already been conducted thereafter by the respondent-commission. Due to lapse of time also, writ petition has become infructous.

Writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 25.4.2019 Transmission Date NA