Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19779/2024bail rejected

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-27Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19779 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2023 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Mandal Son of Sushil Mandal Resident of Laxmipur, P.S. - Barahra, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Fazle Karim For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Barahra P.S Case No. 309 of 2023 from the Court of learned C.J.M, Purnea registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 411 of the I.P.C.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with co-accused have assaulted the informant and looted his tractor, mobile and money.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is named in FIR. It is also submitted that petitioner is in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19779 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2024 2/2 judicial custody since 11.08.2023.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. In view of the allegation as regard to theft of tractor as well as mobile and money recovered from the possession of this petitioner, and also considering the seriousness of this case this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the trial court is directed to concluded the trial within a period of one year from a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, the petitioner has liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the trial court.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T