← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41613/2017bail granted

Ranjay Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41613 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2017 Thana -SHYAMPUR BHATHA District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Ranjay Ram son of Late Khenaha Ram @ Khenha Ram, Resident of Village- Shyampur Tole, Chamainiya, P.S. Shyampur Bhataha, DistrictSheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pronati Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.06.2017 in connection with Shyampur Bhataha P.S. Case No. 46/2017 for offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that on a secret tip off that the petitioner has concealed the stolen motorcycle in his house, the police conducted a raid and from the house of the petitioner, the stolen motorcycle was recovered. On interrogation, the petitioner stated that he had bought the said motorcycle from one

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41613 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 2/3 Sikandar Paswan.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal history and has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that no overt act has been alleged to have been committed by the petitioner and just because he was the purchaser of the stolen motorcycle he has been made accused. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering of the prosecution witnesses by the petitioner.

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sheohar, in connection with Shyampur Bhataha P.S. Case No. 46/2017, subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner and that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41613 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 3/3 if the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned court below for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- U T