← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19500/2025disposed

Raja Babu Kumar @ Raja Babu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-23Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19500 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2025 Thana- Excise Arwal District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Raja Babu Kumar @ Raja Babu Son of Bijendra Ram Resident Of Village -Ranipur, PS - Paliganj, Dist - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized motorcycle. It is further submitted that it has been falsely alleged in the FIR that petitioner was apprehended and he fled taking advantage of the fog. It is next submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19500 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/3 petitioner came to be implicated based on an Aadhaar Card which was found near the place of occurrence but then the same does not in any manner indicate that petitioner was involved in the occurrence.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Arwal Excise P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19500 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 3/3 shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner has antecedent of only one case in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T