Vikas Modi @ Vikash Modi @ Vikas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40619 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2017 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Vikas Modi @ Vikash Modi @ Vikas Kumar Son of Bajrangi Modi @ Bajrangi Baranwal, Resident of Bodhman Talaw Jamui, Police StationJamui, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. PARMANAND PRASAD, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30 (a), 41 and 47 of Bihar Excise Amendment Act. It is contended that, as per allegation, 360 liters of country made liquor were recovered from dickey of the car. There is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. It is urged that the petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2017. It is stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has also involved in Jamui P.S. Case No.34/2017 under Section 30 (a) of Excise Act and Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40619 of 2017(2) dt.25-08-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M-I, Jamui in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 135/2017 with a condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

That apart, in view of the antecedents of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Jamui within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T