Baijnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38969 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -63 Year- 2018 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. Baijnath Yadav, S/o Nuneshwar Yadav, R/o village-Lewa, P.S. - Charkapathar (Sono), District- Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar-1, APP Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 11-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as well as counsel for the Informant. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sono (Charkapathar) P.S. Case No.63 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506/34 Indian Penal Code.
In the written report, it is alleged against this petitioner that he assaulted Chintaman Yadav with farsa causing injury on his head.
Injury report of Chintaman Yadav has been enclosed as Annexure-3, wherein, doctor has found one lacerated wound on parietal bone and after CT scan injury was found to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38969 of 2018 (3) dt.11-07-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sono (Charkapathar) P.S. Case No.63 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.
with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T