Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23454 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2015 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== MUNNA KUMAR Son of Bhupendra Yadav. Resident of Village- Chouraha, P.S.- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The F.I.R. of the occurrence of robbery is against three unknown persons. Petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2015. Petitioner was never put on Test Identification Parade, nor anything was recovered from his possession, rather name of the petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused.

On that material, prayer for bail of the petitioner was refused earlier on 28.03.2016 and thereafter on 09.11.2016. However, the report of the learned trial judge would reveal that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23454 of 2019(4) dt.11-06-2019 2/2 the prosecution evidence is not complete up till now. Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sessions Trial No.34 of 2016, arising out of Singheshwar Police Station Case No.170 of 2015, subject to condition that both the bailors shall be resident of within the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) abhishek/- U T