← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26831/2021bail granted

Kranti Ram @ Kanti Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-03Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26831 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2020 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Kranti Ram @ Kanti Ram aged about 27 years, Son Of Jay Shankar Ram R/O Village- Mansurpur, P.S.- Zero Mile, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2021 Heard Dr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor through video conferencing.

The petitioner who is in custody since 31.12.2020 seeks regular bail in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 374 of 2020 for the offence punishable under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution story in brief is that huge quantity of foreign made liquor was recovered and in this regard a motorcycle bearing registration no. BR-10AA-5040 was also seized in course of raid conducted by the raiding team on 30.12.2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26831 of 2021(3) dt.03-12-2021 2/3 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that since he has been made accused in one another case relating to Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 776 of 2019 for the offence under sections 323, 308, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code, he has been roped in the present case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and as such, the petitioner be released on bail.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner considering the above mentioned facts and criminal history of the petitioner who has been engaged in similar case.

Considering above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case and the criminal case pending against the petitioner, let the Court Below verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as to whether he is engaged in any other case within the territory of State of Bihar and upon being satisfied, release the petitioner, named above, on bail on furnishing on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Two lakhs) with two sureties of the equal amount to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 374 of 2020 subject to the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26831 of 2021(3) dt.03-12-2021 3/3

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Ravi/- U T