← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41784/2017bail granted

Shashi Bhushan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41784 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2015 Thana -PAROO District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Shashi Bhushan Rai Son of Late maheshwar Rai, R/o Village- Matihani, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 125 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 270, 272, 273, 420, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 130 litres of country made wine.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Moreover, petitioner has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody for last six months and has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41784 of 2017 (2) dt.08-09-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for six months, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 125 of 2015. It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T