Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44356/2017bail granted

Sanjay Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44356 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -251 Year- 2017 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Sanjay Paswan Son of Late Basudeo Paswan, Resident of Village-Gangti, P.S.-Imamganj, District-Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the State.

The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No.251 of 2017, registered for offences alleged under Sections 399, 402, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, according to the seizure list, which is available on the record, one live cartridge of .315 Bore and one mobile with Sim were recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal history and he is in custody since 16.05.2017. Learned counsel submits that allegations of recovery are

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44356 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 concocted and even seizure list has not been prepared in accordance with law.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Sanjay Paswan be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No.251 of 2017, subject to the conditions U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C. and subject to the further condition that one of the bailors should be family member of the petitioner.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T