Bipin Vishwakarma @ Bipin Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15943 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-680 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Bipin Vishwakarma @ Bipin Kumar Sharma S/o- Late Brijnanadan Sharma, R/o Mohalla- Afgila Devi Asthan, P S- Muffasil, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 680 of 2024, dated 09.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 25(1-b)a, 25(1)a, 25(1)c and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant under the direction of SHO Muffasil, Police Station Gaya and on the instance of apprehended accused, raided the house of the petitioner and recovered one country made katta and tools for preparing arms and weapons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that no any incriminating article has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15943 of 2025(2) dt.19-04-2025 2/2 recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, rather the alleged recovery has been made from the joint house in question and petitioner is not the sole owner the said house. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as petitioner's period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 680 of 2024, on further condition:

(I) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned trial Court on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T