Ravi Singh @ Ravi Prakash Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44983 of 2017 (2) dt.18-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44983 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2017 Thana -JIRADEI District- SIWAN ======================================================
1. Ravi Singh @ Ravi Prakash Singh, Son of Om Prakash Singh
2. Amrendra Chauhan @ Amarendra Chauhan, Son of Jhulan Chauhan Both resident of Village + P.S. - Jiradei, District - Siwan. .... .... Petitioners/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Ram Sandesh Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2017 The petitioners seeks regular bail in connection with Jiradei P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation is of recovery of 93 litres of country made liquor.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have been in judicial custody since 01.08.2017 and so far criminal antecedent is concerned petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent but that is not of similar nature as the present one and petitioner no. 2 has no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44983 of 2017 (2) dt.18-09-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge -II, Siwan, in connection with Jiradei P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017.
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T