Amit Kumar @ Anshu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16056 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2020 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Anshu Son Of Rajendra Sharma R/O Mohalla- New Godown, Pahsi Lane, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Priya Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 204 of 2020 lodged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the I.P.C.

As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is to attack on his in-laws family by knife, in which four persons including his mother-in-law were injured and mother-in-law sustained grievous injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2020 having clean antecedent and charge has already been framed in this case. He also submits that it is a case of 307 I.P.C. which has alleged to be taken place on 03.06.2020. He further submits that petitioner is ready to support at trial.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16056 of 2022(4) dt.30-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that if the petitioner shall be released on bail, then trial shall not be concluded and petitioner may create hurdle in the trial.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and his bail application is hereby rejected. Liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail 3 months from the date of framing charge.

Trial Court is hereby directed to expedite the trial as early as possible.

In case, the trial shall not be concluded within in 3 months from today, Trial Court is directed to release the petitioner on bail, imposing its own conditions so that he may not evade his appearance during trial, in case trial shall be concluded within said time period.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ashishsingh/- U T