← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48794/2017bail granted

Jai Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-17Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48794 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2015 Thana -AJIMABAD District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Jai Kumar Yadav, son of Shivdeep Yadav, resident of Village - Khedi, Police Station - Narainpur, District - Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh-1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 25.8.2017 in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No.51 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 364/34 and 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against 24 named accused persons and no specific role has been assigned to the present petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ranjan Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bhojpur,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48794 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 Ara, in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No.51 of 2015, on the terms and conditions noted herein below: (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner will be a blood relative having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner will co-operate in the disposal of the trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T