← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/454/2022disposed

Pawan Kumar, v. The Union Of India

2025-04-16Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice S. B. P. Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.454 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8307 of 2021 ====================================================== Pawan Kumar, son of Late Dileshwar Yadav, Resident of Village-Manjhla Khurd, P.O.-Dumari Chatti, P.S.-Fatehpur, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Sri Chhatrahal Singh, the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur.

2.

Sri Anup Sharma, son of not known the petitioner, The Chief Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Hajipur.

3.

Sri Ashish Bansal, son of not known the petitioner, The Divisional Railway Manager, Dhanbad Division, P.O.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 4.

Sri Manoj Kumar, son of not known the petitioner, The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Dhanbad Division, East Central Railway, P.O.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad.

5.

Sri Vikash Chandra Yadav, The Station Superintendent, Gajhandi Railway Station, P.O. Gajhandi, District-Koderma.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate Ms.Ritika Rani, Advocate Ms. Himja G. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Maurya Vuijay Chandra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 16-04-2025 In the light of reasoned and speaking order dated 11.03.2022 furnished as Annexure-R-4 to show cause, it is evident that the grievance of the appellant has been considered and rejected.

2. Having regard to the direction of the co-ordinate

Patna High Court MJC No.454 of 2022 dt.16-04-2025 2/2 Bench for considering the petitioner's case for granting compassionate appointment afresh, the present MJC do not survive for consideration.

3. Accordingly, the present MJC stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 11.03.2022(Annexure-R-4) to show cause.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) ranjan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 18.04.2025 Transmission Date NA