← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35957/2018allowed

Anish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-24Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35957 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-860 Year-2017 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Anish Kumar S/o Horil Prasad, Resident of Village- Basdeo Chhapra, P.S. Meenapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Nand Kishore Pd ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 24-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner is in custody in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. case No. 860 of 2017 for the offence under sections 379, 401 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 4.12.2017.

In this case, vide order dated 22.06.2018 status report was called for. From perusal of the status report, it appears that the case is pending for examination of prosecution witnesses and next date is fixed on 16.07.2018.

Considering the fact that petitioner has remained in custody for more than seven months, let the petitioner, named

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35957 of 2018(3) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Judge-XV cum ACJM-XIV, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 860 of 2017 (Trial No. 1276/18) with the condition that the bailors should be family members of the petitioner and he shall extend full cooperation in the conclusion of the trial and in the event, the petitioner neglects in assisting the court, the trial court cancel the bail bond of the petitioner, if it is found that he is avoiding the court proceeding.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T