Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17016/2020bail rejected

Bhorik Yadav @ Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-10Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17016 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2017 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== BHORIK YADAV @ ASHOK YADAV S/o Ram Sakal Yadav R/o villageNizampur Tola, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP For the Informant : Mr. Love Kush, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-09-2020 As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bikram PS Case No. 145 of 2017 (Sessions Trial No. 181 of 2018 registered under Sections 302, 120B, 307, 325, 341, 323 and 34. of the IPC.

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail after its earlier rejection in Cr. Misc. No. 11177 of 2018. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that now the petitioner is in custody for more than three years, i.e. since 11.8.2017.

Learned Counsel for the informant and the learned APP have opposed the prayer for bail. Learned Counsel for the informant submits that all the witnesses, except the doctor, have been examined

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17016 of 2020(2) dt.10-09-2020 2/2 already.

Since the trial is near completion and there is serious allegation of causing death by assaulting the victim with iron rod attributed to the petitioner, this Court would not allow the petitioner's prayer for bail.

This application is dismissed.

This Court would however observe that the trial court should proceed expeditiously to conclude the trial. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U T