Subodh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26683 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== SUBODH YADAV, age about 26 (Male), S/o Chandra Yadav, R/o villageHathochak, P.S.- Rajauli, Distt.- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 100 liters Mahua wine is recovered from the bank of the river. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26683 of 2021(2) dt.13-07-2021 2/3 in the present case. It is alleged that total 100 liters Mahua wine is recovered from the bank of the river. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the basis of disclosure made by the local residents. The names of the local residents, who have named the petitioner, have not been disclosed by the prosecution. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-II-cumSpecial Judge, Nawada, in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 23 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26683 of 2021(2) dt.13-07-2021 3/3 furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T