Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48309/2017bail granted

Ajay Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48309 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -303 Year- 2017 Thana -MAJORGANJ District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Ajay Mahto S/o- Yugal Mahto, resident of Village+ P.O.- Narha, P.S.- Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Majorganj P.S.Case No. 303/2017 registered for the offences punishable under sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 35 litres of liquor from the motorcycle of the petitioner and the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he was not arrested at the spot. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody for two and half months having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48309 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupess twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J.II cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Majorganj P.S.Case No. 303/2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties in the jurisdiction of court concerned.

(ii) If involvement of the petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Surendra/- U