Abbas Rahaman @ Abdul Rahaman @ Rahaman Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16114 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Jamui * ====================================================== 1.

ABBAS RAHAMAN @ ABDUL RAHAMAN @ RAHAMAN ANSARI , Son of Late Bhoju Mian 2.

Nazama Khatoon, Wife of Abbas Rahaman @ Abdul Rahaman @ Rahaman Ansari 3.

Md. Hasim Ansari @ Hasib Ansari, Son of Abbas Rahaman @ Abdul Rahaman @ Rahaman Ansari 4.

Md. Sakil @ Sagir Ansari, Son of Abbas Rahaman @ Abdul Rahaman @ Rahaman Ansari 5.

Sairun @ Sairun Khatoon, Son of Abbas Rahaman @ Abdul Rahaman @ Rahaman Ansari Petitioner nos.1 to 5 are resident of village-Paira Maliyana, P.S.-Sono, District-Jamui 6.

Rehana Khatoon, Wife of Faruk Mian Resident of Village - Baijalpura, P.s.- Jhajha, Distt.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP representing the State.

Petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Jamui Mahila P.S. Case No. 77 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 313 and 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners happen to be the in-laws of the informant and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16114 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2 they have falsely been implicated in this case because they are relations of the husband of the informant. There is general and omnibus allegation of assault for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for bail.

In the given facts and circumstances of the case wherein these petitioners are said to be in-laws and allegedly made accused because they happen to be the relations of the husband of the informant as also that the FIR has been lodged after four months of the alleged occurrence on 15.07.2018, in case of arrest or surrender of the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today, the abovenamed petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfication of the learned S.D.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jamui Mahila P.S. Case No. 77 of 2018, subject to the condition prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T