Patna High Court/26325/2021allowed

Sujit Rai @ Sujit Raj @ Kanhai @ Sujit Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-29Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26325 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2020 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR RAIL P.S. DistrictSaran ====================================================== SUJIT RAI @ SUJIT RAJ @ KANHAI @ SUJIT RAI Son of Amarnath Sahani Resident of Village- Mallah Toli, Near over Bridge, Police StationKazimohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 379, 411, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, one unknown miscreant snatched the mobile phone of the informant and jumped down from the running train. The stolen mobile is said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. Petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2020. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26325 of 2021(2) dt.29-07-2021 2/2 Considering the facts of the case and the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur, Saran in connection with Muzaffarpur Rail PS case No.79/2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/ her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T