Hasmuddin Ansari @ Hasmuddin Miyan @ Hasamudin Miyan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19478 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Hasmuddin Ansari @ Hasmuddin Miyan @ Hasamudin Miyan S/o Late Ibahim Mian Resident of Village- Nakardei, Nanhaki Tola, P.S.- Nakardei, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with N.D.P.S Case No. 144 of 2025 arising out of Ramgarhwa P.S Case No. 130 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 8, 18,21 (C), 22 (C) and 29 of the N.D.P.S Act.

3. Earlier vide order dated 12.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54038 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the recovery of contraband beyond commercial quantity coupled with embargo under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S Act.

4. In compliance of the order dated 03.04.2026, a report

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19478 of 2026(3) dt.08-05-2026 2/2 dated 08.04.2026 with regard to the present stage of trial has been received. From perusal of the aforesaid report, it appears that the charge has been framed under Section 21(C),25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S Act on 18.10.2025. It is further reported that summon has been issued against nine named Charge-sheeted witnesses, no prosecution witnesses have been examined.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.05.2025 without any rhymes or reason.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

7. There is no fresh ground to consider the bail petition of the petitioner.

8. In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/Sukriti U T