Firoz Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31707 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Firoz Ansari, S/o Sabir Ansari, Resident of Mohalla- Sangram Tola, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur, at Present residing bnear Saveta Apartment in front of Nirmankari Bhawan, Salsumha, Umargaon, P.S.- Umargaon, Tehsil Umargaon, District- Belsad, Gujrat.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Farha Bano W/o Firoz Ansari, D/o Md. Azaharul Islam, at resident of Mohalla- Sangam Tola Present residing at Mohalla Milki, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Amarendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sri Rajeev Nayan, A.P.P.

For opposite party no. 2 :

Md. Ataul Haque, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31707 of 2018(3) dt.18-06-2018 2/2 petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R .

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ara in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 29 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T