← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8472/2021withdrawn

Abhay Kumar Thakur v. The Union Of India

2022-01-03The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8472 of 2021 ====================================================== Abhay Kumar Thakur Son of Late Prabhakant Thakur, Resident of Vill. - Chainpur, P.O. - Mittanchak, P.S. Gopalpur, Mittanchak, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Dept of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2.

The State Bank of India, through the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, having Head Office at State Bank Bhawan, M.C. Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai.

3.

The Authorised Officer-cum-Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India, Main Branch, Patna, West of Gandhi Maidan. 4.

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Agamkuan Branch, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dr.K.N.Singh, ASG For the SBI : Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 03-01-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "I. For setting aside the Annexure-1 letter no.2027 dated 17.12.2020 (Annexure-1) issued by the Respondent no.3 of the Bank rejecting the application of the petitioner filed on 10.12.2020 and consequently setting aside the letter issued vide letter no.1353 dated 9.11.2020 as possession notice enclosing possession letter of the same date (Annexure-2) taking notional possession of residential house of the petitioner and regularization of monthly repayment schedule for the loan amount by giving loan reschedule schemes benefits formulated by the Reserve Bank of India.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8472 of 2021(2) dt.03-01-2022 2/2 II. For declaration the actions for taking over possession of residential house of the petitioner is illegal, band in law, null and void. III. During the pendency of the writ petition further proceeding may kindly be stayed. IV. For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) K.C.Jha/DKS/- U