← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6055/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

M/S Laxmi Textile v. The State Of Bihar,

2024-04-09Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6055 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

M/s Laxmi Textile Manpiur, Patwatoli, P.S. Buniyadganj, District- Gaya, Prop. Smt. Vijay Laxmi Devi, W/o Lok Nath Prasad. 2.

Smt. Vijay Laxmi Devi, W/o Lok Nath Prasad, R/o Manpiur, Patwatoli, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Gaya, District- Gaya. 3.

The Officer Incharge, District Nilam Patra, Sakha, Gaya. 4.

The Chairman, Daksin Bihar Gramin Bank, Gaya. 5.

The Regional Manager, Dakshin Gramin Bank, R/O.- Gaya, District- Gaya. 6.

The Branch Manager, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Patwatoli, Manpur, District- Gaya.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None For the Respondents :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan (SC25) :

Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate :

Mr. Ritik Shah, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 This Court has passed a detailed order on 01.04.2024, stating that order dated 26.02.2024 has not been complied by the petitioners. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the respondents that inspite of the several directions given by this Court, the petitioners have not complied with the order. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 01.04.2024 and, therefore, as a last indulgence, this Court directed to list the matter on 02.04.2024 with a specific direction that no further

Patna High Court CWJC No.6055 of 2020(7) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 adjournment shall be granted. In spite of the said order, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, this Court is of the considerable view that the petitioners have no interest to evince with the matter.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as default and for non-prosecution.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Shanu/- U