Animesh Kumar @ Animesk Anand @ Animesh Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14451 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2017 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== ANIMESH KUMAR @ ANIMESK ANAND @ ANIMESH ANAND KUMAR Son of Late Ashok Kumar Singh @ Ashok Singh Resident of Village - Shivganj (Dariapur), P.S.- Muffasil, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Kamal Nayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 30-06-2020 The present petition has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Navin Kumar Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with G.R. No. 1692 of 2017 arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 168 of 2017 for the offence registered under Sections 448, 186, 353, 323, 427, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The case of the prosecution in brief is that while the informant was working in his office on 08.07.2017, at about 12:15 P.M., the petitioner along with one unknown person had entered his office and started abusing him as also had snatched his mobile and thrown it on the ground.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14451 of 2020(2) dt.30-06-2020 2/2 petitioner is innocent, has been falsely implicated in the present case and is having a clean antecedent. It is further submitted that on account of personal rivalry, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case.

Per contra, the learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the fact that the petitioner is having a clean antecedent, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioner to the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Munger in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 168 of 2017 of subject to the conditions as stipulated under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T