Shambhu Das @ Shambhu Burnwal @ Shambhu Sinduria v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51057 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2014 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. Shambhu Das @ Shambhu Burnwal @ Shambhu Sinduria son of Huro Modi, Resident of Village- Bichkorwa, P.S. Chakai, District Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Amrendra Kumar S/o Indu Bhushan Prasad Singh, Hazaribagh At present working at Paradip Barauni Haldiya Pipeline as running Manager, DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Singh Shastriji ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Jhajha P.S.Case No.132 of 2014 (G.R.No.1245 of 2014) for the offences punishable under Sections 379/511 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of the petroleum product, which was passing through the gas pipeline.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpired in this case and though he is accused in other cases also but he is on bail in those case. The petitioner is in custody for seven
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51057 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 2/2 months.
Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the I.O.C. They have opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that he is accused in 12 other cases also but only 07 cases have been mentioned in para 3 of the petitioner and details of the other cases have been made.
Having heard both sides and in view of fact that the petitioner has not stated about all the cases in which he is accused, as such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of six months and if not concluded, the learned trial court shall release the petitioner on bail to his own satisfaction.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T