← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20107/2024bail granted

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20107 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2022 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== VIJAY KUMAR @ VIJAY KUMAR YADAV SON OF RAM LAL YADAV R/O-STREET NO. 4, NEAR BAPU MARKET, MJK NAGAR, LOHARA COLONY, LOHORA, P.S.-DHABA, DISTT.-LUDHIANA AT PUNJAB ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 36 litres of liquor from an Alto car. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20107 of 2024(2) dt.22-03-2024 2/2 would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is next submitted that the petitioner was completely unaware that Pankaj would misuse his vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended at the spot along with Anshu, Dinesh and Vinod, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No.270/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T