Patna High CourtCWJC/8681/2015disposed

Pramod Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-30Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.8681 of 2015 (2) dt.30-01-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8681 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Pramod Kumar Thakur Son of Lelal Thakur Resident of Mohiuddin Nagar ( South ) P.O. and P.S. Mohiuddin Nagar, Distt. - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Secretary Department of Land Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary Department of Land Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. District Magistrate, Samastipur

4. Sub - Divisional officer, Patori, Samastipur

5. Circle officer, Mohiuddin Nagar, Samastipur

6. Dhruv Narayan Sah

7. Narendra Prasad Sah

8. Surendra Sah

9. Birendra Prasad Sah

10. Sanjiv Sah @ Munna Sah All sons of Late Lakshmi Narayan Sah

11. Baldev Prasad Sah S/o Late Ganga Sah All Resident of Mohiuddin Nagar ( South ) P.O. and P.S. Mohiuddin Nagar, Distt. - Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjai Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N.Shahi, AAG-10 Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, AC to AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 30-01-2016 Heard Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Assistant Counsel to learned Additional Advocate General-10, appearing on behalf of the respondents. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with

Patna High Court CWJC No.8681 of 2015 (2) dt.30-01-2016 liberty to make appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U