Alok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19607 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Alok Kumar S/o- Prem Kumar Village- Gram Ajmatpur, Anderwara Bharti, P.S- Rajapakar (Warranty O.P), Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 19 years and the informant alleges that her minor daughter aged about 14 years was kidnapped by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner and the victim were of the same age and they were known to each other. It is also submitted that they had not eloped rather had gone out of the village to roam around. It is further submitted that petitioner and the victim came back and the statement of the victim was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19607 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2 recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C wherein she disclosed that she was in love with this petitioner. It is also submitted that, in order to give seriousness to the case, the informant alleges that victim was 14 years of age when victim and the petitioner are nearly of the same age group. It is also submitted that the parties have compromised the case as recorded in the impugned order also.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T