Rojid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25889 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2024 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rojid Ansari S/O Harun Ansari R/O Vill- Tamukuha, P.S.- Dhanha, DistrictWest Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shahbaj Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 110 of 2024 instituted under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act lodged on 30.05.2024 by the informant, Dharmveer Kumar Bharti.
3. As per the prosecution story, on secret information that a bus going from Patna to Padrauna was checked and from four trolley bags, 38 kgs. Ganja was recovered/seized. The passengers carrying them 1 Angad Sah, 2 Shiv Kumari Devi, 3, Pankaj Gupta and 4 Mamta Kumar beside Saguni Devi who all were taken into custody and according to them, the recovered substance belongs to the petitioner. This led to the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he runs CSC as also provides cars on hire. Since the accused were
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25889 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 not provided the car, due to enmity named him. They have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh on the other hand opposes the prayer submitting that the documents are not on record to show that the petitioner is in any other business. The accused have unanimously recorded that the recovered substance belong to the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the recovery, the petitioner has been named, in that background, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail and the same is rejected.
7. However, if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks from today, the Court concerned shall take up the matter and dispose it of without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order.
8. The petitioner is free to provides documents in support of this case.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T