← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16960/2022allowed

Anil Mahto @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-16Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16960 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2021 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Anil Mahto @ Anil Kumar Son Of Surya Narayan Mahto Resident Of Village - Kerwa (Kebra), Khirdhani Tole, P.S. - Saharghat, District - Madhubani.

2.

Uday Prakash Kumar @ Uday Prakash Son Of Tej Narayan Mahto Resident Of Village - Kerwa (Kebra), Khirdhani Tole, P.S. - Saharghat, District - Madhubani.

3.

Sheela Devi Wife Of Vinod Prasad Resident Of Village - Kerwa (Kebra), Khirdhani Tole, P.S. - Saharghat, District - Madhubani. 4.

Anita Devi Wife Of Lal Babu Mahto Resident Of Village - Kerwa (Kebra), Khirdhani Tole, P.S. - Saharghat, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kripa Nand Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 448, 341, 342, 323, 337, 307, 354, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16960 of 2022(2) dt.16-08-2022 2/2 injury. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that both sides have sustained injury, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 86 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T