Sunil Kumar Jha @ Sunil Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16800 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2024 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Sunil Kumar Jha @ Sunil Jha S/o Late Raghari Jha @ Late Ramdhari Jha Resident of Village- Sabour, P.S.- Sabour, Distt.- Bhagalpur 2.

Ajit Jha S/o Late Raghari Jha @ Late Ramdhari Jha Resident of VillageSabour, P.S.- Sabour, Distt.- Bhagalpur 3.

Rajendra Jha S/o Late Raghari Jha @ Late Ramdhari Jha Resident of Village- Sabour, P.S.- Sabour, Distt.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Geeta Kri. Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant by means of Farsa and also snatched his gold ring.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute between the parties, a simple maar-peet took place

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16800 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/2 in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, to be simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 407 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T