← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6762/2021withdrawn

Amrendra Kumar v. Union Of India

2021-12-15The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6762 of 2021 ====================================================== Amrendra Kumar Son of Shri Ramji Singh Village- Hichhan- Bigha Post Office and Police Station- Daudnagar District- Aurangabad- 824143 (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Union of India through Department of Finance and Commerce New Delhi. 2.

Reserve Bank of India State Bank Branch at South Gandhi Maidan Patna through General Manager.

3.

Mahindra and Mahendra Financiar Survice Limited 2nd Floor Sadhna House behind Mahindra Tower 570 PB Marg Worley Mumbai 400018. 4.

Mahindra and Mahindra Financiar Survice Limited Branch Office at Kumar Complex Aurangabad PO- Aurangabad District- Aurangabad. 5.

Recovery agent Mahindra Motor Finance Limited at its Office at Kumar Complex Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dr.K.N.Singh (ASG) For R.B.I. Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-12-2021 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "For direction to the General Manager Reserve Bank of India, Patna State Branch to direct the Mahindra Finance Limited the Respondent No-4 to this writ application to release the illegality and wrongly seized the Scorpio Jeep bearing Registration No. BR-26-PA-2536 of this petitioner on the ground that the dues of Financing Company has not been paid in time, without any court order or order of DRT, Patna as such seizure has been held

Patna High Court CWJC No.6762 of 2021(2) dt.15-12-2021 2/2 illegal and wrong in view of Hon'ble Supreme Court ruling in the case of ICICI Bank Limited Versus Shanti Devi Sharma as well as the ruling made by our own High Court in CWJC No. 18557/2019 dated- 02/12/2019 reported in B.L.J.R. 2020 at page96." Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/- U