Chhotu Kumar Yadav @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15814 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2024 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Chhotu Kumar Yadav @ Chhotu Kumar S/o Baliram Prasad R/o vill - Dhab, P.S.- Sirdalla, Distt.- Nawada 2.

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Prasad @ Bigan Prasad S/o Shivnandan Prasad Yadav @ Shivnandan Yadav R/o vill - Dhab, P.S.- Sirdalla, Distt.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 332 of 2024 registered under Sections 191(2)(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118, 117(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S.

3. Allegedly, while the informant was going to attend call of nature, the accused persons started teasing her and in consequence thereof, the accused persons having lathi-danda in their hands came at the house of the informant and the petitioner No. 2 is said to have assaulted on her head as a result of which, she sustained injury. The other family members of the informant are also said to have been assaulted.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15814 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2 The specific allegation against the petitioner No. 2 is of assaulting the informant but there is no injury on the person of the informant. So far the petitioner No. 1 is concerned, there is allegation against him to inflict assault on the head of informant's father-in-law but the inquiry report/CT Scan report shows that no fracture or hemorrhage was detected in the said report. There is case and counter case between the parties and the members of defence side have also suffered injuries.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Nawada in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 332 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of BNSS. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T