Rakesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40510 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -256 Year- 2015 Thana -MAJORGANJ District- SITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Rakesh Singh, Son of Asharfi Singh, Resident of Village- Kuari Madan, P.S.- Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagjit Roshan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 256/2015. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name transpired during course of investigation.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that only on the basis of suspicion he has been made accused as he was seen with one of the co-accused and except that there is no material to show the involvement of the petitioner. Further, the petitioner has remained in custody for more than one year and nine months. Other co-accused persons have already been granted bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40510 of 2017 (2) dt.01-09-2017 2/2 by different co-ordinate bench of this Court, which would appear from Annexure- 2 series.
Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts, stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd -cum Fast Track Court-II, Sitamarhi in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 256/2015, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that he will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make himself available before the court on each and every date and on failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T