Chhotu @ Chhotu Kumar @ Litti v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39415 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -495 Year- 2016 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Chhotu @ Chhotu Kumar @ Litti, Son of Laxman Rai @ Laxman Gope, resident of village- Pethiya Bazar, Police Station- Danapur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 495/2016. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. During course of investigation his name transpired.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that during course of investigation the name of the petitioner transpired in confession of co-accused. It has been further submitted that one of the co-accused persons, who is named in the F.I.R., has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide Annexure-2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor could not
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39415 of 2017 (3) dt.01-09-2017 2/2 controvert the aforesaid fact.
Having heard both sides, in view of the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 495/2016, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T