Mukesh Nishad @ Mukesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32345 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2018 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Mukesh Nishad @ Mukesh Mahto S/o Rajo Mahto, R/o Vill.- Simariaghat Bindtoli, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai,Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Barauni (Chakiya) P.S. Case No. 53 of 2018, registered for offences alleged under Sections 25 (1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that when he was arrested by police one country made pistol and one live cartridge were recovered from his possession. It is submitted that petitioner has got no criminal history and the seizure list itself has been prepared illegally as there is no independent witness to the seizure list. Learned APP for the State is present and has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32345 of 2018 (2) dt.13-06-2018 2/2 opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 16.02.2018, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni (Chakiya) P.S. Case No. 53 of 2018, subject to the conditions U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T