Arbind Ram @ Arvind Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16352 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Arbind Ram @ Arvind Ram S/o- Dharamnath Ram Resident of Village - Akil Tola, P.S. - Maharajganj, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118, 303(2), 351(1), 352, 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has assaulted the informant on the head with an iron rod, due to which he fell down.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the informant and the petitioner are both co-villagers and the offence has taken place on a trivial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16352 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 issue. He further submits that from perusal of the injury report, it will transpire that a hairline fracture at the vault of the skull was found. He further submits that there was no repetition of the blow, and only a hairline fracture has been found on the skull. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 20.12.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T