← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18340/2024bail granted

Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18340 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2023 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh Son of Rampukar Singh Resident of Village-Rampur Khajuriya, P.S.-Dumariyahat, District-East Champaran. 2.

Shail Devi Wife of Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh Resident of VillageRampur Khajuriya, P.S.-Dumariyahat, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

MR. 'X'

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 118 of 2023 registered under Sections 366(A), 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/8 of POCSO Act.

3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners along with other named accused persons kidnapped the minor daughter of informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18340 of 2024(4) dt.21-08-2024 2/3 petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case merely because petitioners are father and mother of co-accused Ankit Kumar. Further submission is that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has categorically stated that she is 18 years old and she on her own will had gone with co-accused Ankit Kumar to Punjab, where she solemnized marriage with him. Lastly, it is submitted that petitioners have got clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the bail application.

6. Having considered the accusation and the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bailbonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 118 of 2023, subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18340 of 2024(4) dt.21-08-2024 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T