Barun Mishra v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34789 of 2017 (2) dt.03-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34789 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2017 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ======================================================
1. Barun Mishra Son of Shyam Sunder Mishra Resident of Village - Budhanpurwa, Sindigate, P.S. - Buxar (T), District - Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 149 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of holding the collar of the informant and allegation against other co-accused person fired on the informant, however, he escaped the said fire. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner from the F.I.R itself it will appear that there is no allegation against the petitioner either of assaulting the petitioner or of firing, only allegation that has been attributed to the petitioner is that he caught the collar of the informant. Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.05.2017.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34789 of 2017 (2) dt.03-08-2017 Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner has criminal antecedents. Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and also the fact that petitioner has criminal antecedents as he is accused in several other cases, as such, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, his application for regular bail is, accordingly, rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T