← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8378/2016withdrawn

Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-11Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8378 of 2016 =========================================================== Amit Kumar, Son of Prabhu Sharan Prasad, Resident of village + P.O.- Kathan, Laukaunathpur, Block- Motihari, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Department of Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Program Officer Establishment, East Champaran.

4. The Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Raj Pataura, Block- Pataura, District- East Champaran.

5. The learned Member, District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, East Champaran.

6. Jay Prakash, Son of Ramesh Prasad Gupta, resident of Gauri Shankar Chawk, Thakurbari, Motihari, District- East Champaran, at present posted as teacher in Navsrijit Primary School, Bintola, Ward No. 6, Gram Panchayat Raj Siswa, West, Block Banjariya, District- East Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madhav Prasad Yadav, G.P. 23 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 23 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ application for filing appeal before the State Teachers Employment Appellate Authority which has been constituted and is functional.

3. Learned counsel for the State does not object.

4. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8378 of 2016 dt.11-04-2017 2/2

5. In view of the fact that the petitioner had moved in close proximity of the order dated 06.04.2016 and thereafter the matter was pending before this Court, if an appeal is preferred by the petitioner before the State Appellate Authority within three weeks from today, along with a copy of this order, the same shall be heard and disposed off on merits in accordance with law. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U