Sinku Singh @ Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14512 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-435 Year-2019 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== SINKU SINGH @ RAHUL SINGH Son of Jay Ram Singh Resident of Village - Dhangai, Road, P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-09-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad, the learned APP for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 435 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 27.08.2019 at about 7:30 PM. while the son of the informant was standing near the Durga Ji Temple, all of a sudden, the petitioner herein along with two other persons had arrived there on a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14512 of 2020(3) dt.09-09-2020 2/3 motorcycle and assaulted the son of the informant by iron rod on his head and neck resulting in him falling on the ground and having become unconscious, whereafter, they had taken his gold locket and a sum of Rs. 9,000/- from his pocket and then, the accused persons fled away. It appears that the victim i.e. the son of the informant had succumbed to his injuries during the course of treatment.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is having a clean antecedent. It is further submitted that there is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence.

Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the materials available in the case diary, this Court finds that prima facie, a case is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14512 of 2020(3) dt.09-09-2020 3/3 definitely made out against the petitioner herein, for the offences alleged, hence, I do not find any reason to consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail, thus, the present petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U T